By Julia Hudson
I’m
the only girl on this blogging team, so in this post I’m going to talk about
toasters, cushions, vintage, and almost certainly fashion. Consider yourselves duly
warned.
If
you venture into any trendy retail establishment or hip cocktail bar, you will
find a smorgasbord of “retro”. Gatsby-inspired beaded flapper dresses, Smeg
fridges, beehives (not the buzzing kind), and endless looks back towards a
bygone era. Vintage is in, and many trendsetters are rejecting progressive
design in favour of authentic or faithfully reproduced pieces of history which
are permeating our daily lives.
Last
week, I went to the Royal Festival Hall for the eagerly-anticipated Sao Paolo
Symphony Orchestra Brazilian-themed concert, conducted by Marin Alsop. The
programme was close to Alsop’s heart, mentored as she was by Bernstein, who was
in turn a close supporter of Guarnieri, and who commissioned Berio’s Sinfonia, which
was performed with the Swingle Singers in the second half. Introducing the
pieces with a friendly, collaborative air, Alsop seemed comfortable and the
orchestra responded beautifully.
Mad Men's stylish Joan Holloway |
But, with our
embrace (on this blog, and throughout much of the classical music world) of all
things forward-looking and innovative, of music fused with technology and
progressive thinking, was this concert dated, out of touch and (dare we say it)
passé? Surprisingly, the music still had the power to shock, and shock it did –
six of my neighbours had walked out by the end of the first movement of the
Berio, with its vocal grunting and squeaking and constant referencing of other
works. This, considering how much has passed in society since this music was
conceived – Miley’s twerking, clearly, has nothing on this.
Where is the line, then, between dated and retro? Is it down to quality, authenticity, consistency? The young,
beautiful, trendy incarnation of Swingles, though, were key, as was the
vibrant orchestra. However, there is something about the past which unsettles
my (Eighties) generation. To pull the girl card again, I’ve just started
watching Mad Men, and am finding the flagrant sexism and disregard for female
intelligence disturbing. I enjoy vintage clothing, music from bygone eras and
am partial to the occasional beehive, but a “real” authenticity of values and
belief systems doesn’t sit well with my contemporary ones.
So, where does
this leave music? Nick
Breckenfield suggests that “there are derisory claims as to the Royal Festival
Hall’s plain, even austere, functionality…[but that it is] just as much a
product of its times as the spirit of hope that gave birth to the Festival of
Britain.” Perhaps this is the key – we don’t have to disparage or dismiss more
contemporary music, with its pared-down, Bauhaus-esque aesthetic, if we view
Friday’s exciting and still powerful music as a product of its times. When one
considers that Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring was written less than 40 years
earlier, this suddenly isn’t so hard to do.
Nicely written, Julia. Well done!
ReplyDelete